A Socialized Health Care System Requires Population Control and Impeccable Registries

In a nationalized health care system, you must know who is who : otherwise the device could never be able determine who is entitled. The structure depends on how the Natural Human Growth Hormone system is generated and designed, but with a nationalized health care system you will be followed by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in america. The nationalized health care system becomes a vehicle for population control.

If you leave the united states and are no longer a hawaiian for resident ) of the state, even if you are a citizen and might maintain a driving permission, you will have to report immediately if you want to avoid the 13% health care tax. I exploit the number 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized health care.

Let’s say you moved and you do not want to pay the 13% tax for services you do not receive, can receive, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The large business has no interest to let you go so simple. You will end up having to reveal your private life : partner, homes, travel, money, and job to prove your case that you have the right to leave the public health care system and does not have to pay the tax. If you have to seek an appeal, your information could be a part of management documents that are open and public documents. As soon as you get back to the united states, you will be automatically enrollment again and the taxes start to compile.

Public wide-spread health care has no interest in protecting your privacy. They want their tax money and, to fight for your the law, you will have to prove that you meet the requirements to not be taxable. In that process, your private life is up for display.

The national ID-card and national population registry that includes your medical information is a foundation of the nationalized health care system. You can see where this is going : population control and capacity use the law and health care access to map your entire private life in public areas searchable repository owned and handled by the government.

By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks where you live, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can receive wide-spread health care from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, more information about yourself than you can remember. The Swedish government has brought sharing of information between agencies to a new level. The reason being very simple : to get health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.

It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can transform the registered information in the data. So if you want to change your name, even the slightest change, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry makes it possible to determine who is who under all circumstances and it is necessary for the national health care system. Otherwise, any person could claim to be entitled.

To implement that in the united states requires a completely new doctrine for population registry and control. In an American context that would require that every existing driving permission had to be voided and reapplied under stricter identification rules that would match not only data from Internal revenue service, local government, city government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but almost any agency that provides services to the general public. The reason why a new population registry would be needed in the united states is the fact that lax rules dating back to the 1940s up until the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made a significant percentage of information that is personal about individuals questionable.

If America instead neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be possible and the floodgates for fraud would open and uncontrolled punishment of the system would prevail. This would eventually bring down the device.

It is financially impossible to make a wide-spread health care system without clearly knowing who is entitled and not. The device needs to have limits of its entitlement. A social security number would not adequate as these numbers have been given out through decades to temporary residents that might not even live in the united states or might today be out of status as illegal immigrants.

The Congress has investigated the cost of many of the “public options”, but still we have no clear picture of the actual realm of the group that you will find entitled and under which conditions. The risk is political. It is very simple for political reasons to extend the entitlement. People in politics would have a hard time being firm on illegal immigrants’ entitlement, as that would put the people in politics on a accidents course with mainly the Hispanic community as they represent a significant area of the illegal immigrants. So the easy sell is then that everyone that is a legal hawaiian for resident ) strange or citizen can join according to one fee plan and then the illegal immigrants can join according to a new fee structure. That thinks that they actually pay the fee which is a wild guess as they are often able to gain access to service while not having to state that they are illegal immigrants.

It would work politically : but again : without an impeccable population registry and control over who is who on a national level, this is unlikely to ensure success. The device would be predestined to fail because of lack of funds. If you design a system to provide the health care needs for a population and then increase that population without any additional funds : then naturally it would lead to a lower level of service, declined quality, and waiting lists for complex procedures. In real terms, American health care goes from being a first world system to a under-developed system.

Thousands, if not a million, American residents live as any other American citizen but they are still not in good standing with their immigration even if they are here for ten or fifteen years. A wide-spread health care system will raise issues about who is entitled and who is not.

The alternative is for an American wide-spread health care system to surrender to the fact that there is no order in the population registry and just provide health care for everyone who shows up. If that is done, costs will dramatically increase at some level depending on who will pick up the bill : hawaii government, the federal government, or the public health care system.

Illegal immigrants that have arrived within the last years and make up a significant population would create an enormous pressure on a wide-spread health care, if implemented, in states like Arizona and California. If they pick up wide-spread health care, it would be a pure loss for the system as they mostly work for cash. They will never be payees into the wide-spread health care system as it is based on salary taxes, and they cannot file taxes.

The difference is that Sweden has minimal illegal immigrants when compared to the United states. The Swedes do not provide health care services for illegal immigrants and the illegal immigrants can be caught and deported if they require public service without good legal standing.

This firm and uniform viewpoint towards illegal immigration is important to avoid a wide-spread health care system from crumbling down and to maintain a sustainable proportion between those who pay into the system and those who benefit from it.

The working middle class that you will find the back to pay into the system would not only face that their existing health care is halved in its service value : but most likely face higher cost of health care as they will be the ones to receive the bill.

The wide-spread health care system would have maybe 60 million to 75 million “free riders” if based on income taxes, and possibly half if based on fees, that wont pay anything into the system. We already know that approximately 60 million Americans pay no taxes as adults add to that the estimated 10-15 million illegal immigrants.

There is no way that a wide-spread health care system can be viably implemented unless America creates a population registry that can identify the entitlements for each individual and that it is fair to be designed from scratch to a high degree as we can not rely on driver’s license data as the quality would be too low : too many errors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.